http://jcps.bjmu.edu.cn

中国药学(英文版) ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 755-763.DOI: 10.5246/jcps.2023.09.062

• 【药事管理与临床药学专栏】 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于KAP理论的石家庄市区居民用药风险调查研究

王可欣1, 田胜男1, 王佳1, 靳瑾1, 王婷婷2, 张丽藏1, 刘焕龙1,*()   

  1. 1. The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China
    2. 西安交通大学 公共卫生学院, 陕西 西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-22 修回日期:2023-04-10 接受日期:2023-04-25 出版日期:2023-09-30 发布日期:2023-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 刘焕龙
  • 作者简介:
    + Tel.: +86-13831117995, E-mail:
  • 基金资助:
    The project of Hebei Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 2020167), the project of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Grant No. 2HS202014) and the Chinese Medicine Association (Grant No. CMEI2019KPYJ00142).

Investigation and research on medication risk of Shijiazhuang urban residents based on KAP Theory

Kexin Wang1, Shengnan Tian1, Jia Wang1, Jin Jin1, Tingting Wang2, Licang Zhang1, Huanlong Liu1,*()   

  1. 1 河北医科大学第二医院, 河北 石家庄 050000
    2 School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2023-03-22 Revised:2023-04-10 Accepted:2023-04-25 Online:2023-09-30 Published:2023-09-30
  • Contact: Huanlong Liu

摘要:

调查石家庄市区居民用药知识、态度、行为(KAP)现状, 分析用药过程中存在的潜在风险和影响因素, 为开展公众安全用药教育提供参考依据。本样本采用线上问卷法对石家庄市区居民用药现状进行调查, 用单因素方差分析、T检验、Logistic回归分析影响KAP的因素, 同时采用Spearman相关分析对其相关性进行统计。结果表明居民用药的知识、态度和行为分别为(110.4 ± 18.3)分、(39.0 ± 12.2)分和(91.3 ± 11.5)分。Logistic回归结果表明, 年龄、受教育程度、职业是影响用药知识的主要因素, 受教育程度、职业是影响用药态度的主要因素, 用药行为主要受性别、年龄的影响。随着年龄增长, 居民用药知识和用药行为水平均有所提高, 36–65岁年龄段知识水平较高。男性用药知识、态度、行为均低于女性, 非医药卫生行业、受教育程度低是居民用药知识匮乏、用药态度较差的重要因素。居民用药知识和行为的相关系数为0.331(P < 0.01)。总之, 石家庄市区居民安全用药的KAP现状总体为中等水平, 需加强重点高危人群(个别年龄段、受教育程度低、非医药卫生行业、男性)的用药教育, 以促进安全、合理用药。

关键词: 用药风险调查, 影响因素, 相关性分析, 用药教育

Abstract:

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the medication knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of urban residents in Shijiazhuang, while also analyzing potential risks and influencing factors in the medication process. An online questionnaire was used to investigate the current medication situation among Shijiazhuang residents. Statistical analyses, such as one-way ANOVA, Student’s t-test, logistic regression, and Spearman correlation, were employed. The results showed that the average scores of resident’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices were (110.4 ± 18.3) points, (39.0 ± 12.2) points, and (91.3 ± 11.5) points, respectively. Logistic regression analysis indicated that age, education, and occupation were the main factors affecting medication knowledge; education and occupation were the primary factors affecting medication attitude; and medication practices were mainly influenced by gender and age. The study found that as age increased, the level of medication knowledge and practices among residents also improved, with those aged 36–65 showing higher knowledge. Male residents exhibited lower knowledge, attitude, and practices of medication than their female counterparts. Non-medical and health industries, as well as low education levels, were important factors for the lack of medication knowledge and poor attitude among residents. The correlation coefficient between medication knowledge and practices was 0.331 (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the KAP of safe medication among residents in Shijiazhuang was generally moderate. Medication education should target special groups, such as those with low education levels, non-medical and health practitioners, males, and specific age groups, to promote safe and rational medication. This study provides a reference for public education on safe medication practices.

Key words: Medication risk investigation, Influencing factors, Correlation analysis, Medical education

Supporting: