http://jcps.bjmu.edu.cn

中国药学(英文版) ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 767-774.DOI: 10.5246/jcps.2025.08.057

• 【研究论文】 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于与奥司他韦的对比探讨玛巴洛沙韦在12–18周岁流感儿童人群中的使用情况

严荧燕, 沈珑慧*(), 毛佩芝, 朱卓儿, 叶朝辉, 陈漪   

  1. 宁波大学附属妇女儿童医院, 浙江 宁波 315012
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-10 修回日期:2025-05-09 接受日期:2025-06-26 出版日期:2025-08-29 发布日期:2025-08-29
  • 通讯作者: 沈珑慧

Comparative study of Baloxavir Marboxil and Oseltamivir for treating influenza in children aged 12–18 years

Yingyan Yan, Longhui Shen*(), Peizhi Mao, Zhuoer Zhu, Chaohui Ye, Yi Chen   

  1. Women and Children’s Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo 315012, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2025-04-10 Revised:2025-05-09 Accepted:2025-06-26 Online:2025-08-29 Published:2025-08-29
  • Contact: Longhui Shen
  • Supported by:
    Ningbo Top Medical and Health Research Program (Grant No. 2022020405); Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (Grant No. 320.6750.2023-25-3).

摘要:

本研究收集了2023年2–4月流感流行期宁波大学附属妇女儿童医院门急诊明确诊断为甲流的12–18周岁患儿的病例资料和处方资料, 根据用药分为玛巴洛沙韦组(196例)和奥司他韦组(126例), 并采用SPSS Statistics 24.0软件, 对两组间的年龄、性别、体重、初次就诊科室、就诊次数、人均处方费用、药品使用品种、住院率进行了比较, 并比较了两组的合并用药物的情况, 分析玛巴洛沙韦在12–18周岁儿童流感人群中与奥司他韦对比的优劣。结果发现玛巴洛沙韦组就诊次数低于奥司他韦组, 而人均处方费用却高于奥司他韦组, 具有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 两组的年龄、性别、体重、初次就诊科室、药品使用品种数量以及住院率均无差异(P > 0.05)。两组间是否合并使用的药物无差异(P > 0.05), 单类合并药物比较中, 只有抗病毒药物种类数量有差异(P < 0.05), 奥司他韦组需要更多的抗病毒中西药辅助治疗, 两组合并药物的数量均集中在3种和2种(玛巴洛沙韦组41.34%和39.66%; 奥司他韦组44.54%和36.97%)。研究说明了新药玛巴洛沙韦在12–18周岁流感患者中对比奥司他韦体现了一次顿服带来的就诊优势、口服依从性优势, 并具有一定的疗效优势, 在单价费用上可以进行进一步的斟酌参考, 给临床选择使用抗流感药物提供新的依据。

关键词: 玛巴洛沙韦, 奥司他韦, 12–18周岁, 流感儿童

Abstract:

This study analyzed case and prescription data of children aged 12 to 18 years diagnosed with influenza A from the outpatient and emergency departments at the Women and Children’s Hospital of Ningbo University during the influenza epidemic period between February and April 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their medication: the Baloxavir Marboxil group (196 cases) and the Oseltamivir group (126 cases). SPSS Statistics 24.0 software was utilized to compare variables between the two groups, including age, sex, weight, first visit department, number of visits, average prescription cost per patient, drug varieties used, hospitalization rate, and the combined medication usage, to evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two treatments. The results indicated that the number of visits in the Baloxavir Marboxil group was significantly lower than in the Oseltamivir group, whereas the average prescription cost per patient was higher (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, weight, first visit department, number of drug types used, hospitalization rate, or combined medication usage (P > 0.05). When comparing the use of single-class combined drugs, only the quantity of antiviral drugs differed significantly (P < 0.05). The Oseltamivir group required more adjuvant treatment with both Chinese and Western antiviral medications. The distribution of the number of combined drug types was concentrated around three and two types in both groups (Baloxavir Marboxil group: 41.34% and 39.66%; Oseltamivir group: 44.54% and 36.97%). This study highlighted that the new drug, Baloxavir Marboxil, offered certain therapeutic benefits over Oseltamivir in treating influenza among children aged 12 to 18 years, including advantages in single-dose administration, oral compliance, and specific treatment outcomes. The higher unit cost associated with Baloxavir Marboxil might be a factor for further consideration. These findings provided a new reference point for the clinical selection of anti-influenza medications.

Key words: Baloxavir Marboxil, Oseltamivir, 12–18 years old, Influenza children

Supporting: