http://jcps.bjmu.edu.cn

中国药学(英文版)

• 【研究论文】 • 上一篇    下一篇

非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的有效性和安全性比较: 系统评价和荟萃分析

叶志康, 唐惠林, 段京莉, 翟所迪*   

  1. 1. 北京大学 第三医院药剂科, 北京 100191
    2. 北京大学医学部 药学院 药事管理与临床药学系, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-04 修回日期:2013-04-15 出版日期:2013-11-15 发布日期:2014-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 翟所迪*

Efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhikang Ye, Huilin Tang, Jingli Duan, Suodi Zhai*   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2013-03-04 Revised:2013-04-15 Online:2013-11-15 Published:2014-01-22
  • Contact: Suodi Zhai*

摘要:

本文旨在比较非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染患者的安全性和有效性。通过计算机检索Pubmed、Emabse、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆, 纳入比较非达霉素与万古霉素治疗感染艰难梭菌安全性和有效性的随机对照研究。两位研究者独立提取数据。主要终点是临床治愈率, 次要终点是艰难梭菌的复发率和最终治愈率, 采用Revman 5.1的Mantle-Haenszel固定效应模型进行Meta分析。结果共纳入两个大型随机对照研究。非达霉素和万古霉素的临床治愈率在意向性治疗组 (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.66, P = 0.40)和治疗完成组 (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.80-1.92, P = 0.34) 无显著性差异。根据患者的年龄、状况、是否感染过CDI、感染的菌株类型、感染严重程度和合用抗生素的情况进行亚组分析, 临床治愈率同样无显著性差异。非达霉素在意向性治疗组 (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.65, P<0.00001)和治疗完成组 (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, P<0.0001) 显著降低艰难梭菌感染的复发率。非达霉素在意向性治疗组 (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.35-2.27, P<0.0001) 和治疗完成组 (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.40-2.47, P<0.0001) 显著提高患者的最终治愈率。Meta分析结果提示, 非达霉素的临床治愈率并不优于万古霉素, 但是非达霉素可以显著降低艰难梭菌感染的复发率和显著提高最终治愈率。因此非达霉素可能是治疗艰难梭菌感染的有效替代药物, 尤其是在降低感染复发率和提高最终治愈率方面。

关键词: 非达霉素, 万古霉素, 艰难梭菌感染, 临床治愈率, 复发率

Abstract:

To compare the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin and vancomycin for the treatment of patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for the treatment of CDI published in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary outcome was the rates of clinical cure. The secondary endpoints were the rates of CDI recurrence in the 4 weeks period after the end of therapy and rates of global cure, adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantle-Haenszel fixed effect method (FEM). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were reported. The results indicated that two large randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Clinical cure with fidaxomicin was similar to with vancomycin both in the modified intention to treat (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.66, P = 0.40) and in the per-protocol population (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.80-1.92, P = 0.34). There were no significant differences in the rates of clinical cure between fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the subgroups analyzed by age, patients’ status, and previous CDI, infection with B1 strain, severity baseline, and exposure to concomitant antibiotics. Recurrence of CDI was significantly less common among fidaxomicin-treated patients compared with vancomycin-treated patients both in the modified intention-to-treat population (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.65, P<0.00001) and in the per-protocol population (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, P<0.0001). Treatment with fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin was associated with significantly higher rates of global cure both in the modified intention-to-treat population (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.35–2.27, P<0.0001) and in the per-protocol population (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.40-2.47, P<0.0001). Our meta-analysis suggests that fidaxomicin is not superior to vancomycin in rates of clinical cure, while fidaxomicin significantly decreases the rates of CDI recurrence and significantly improves the rates of global cure compared with vancomycin. Thus, fidaxomicin is a promising candidate for treatment of the CDI, especially in decreasing the rates of CDI recurrence and improving the rates of global cure.

Key words: Fidaxomicin, Vancomycin, Clostridium difficile infection, Clinical cure, Recurrence

中图分类号: 

Supporting:

*Corresponding author. Tel.: 86-10-82266686