http://jcps.bjmu.edu.cn

• 【研究论文】 • 上一篇    下一篇

软聚硅酮泡沫吸收敷料治疗压疮的药物经济学研究

韩晟, 王宽, 濮润, 史录文*   

  1. 1. 北京大学医学部 公共卫生学院, 北京 100191
    2. 北京大学医学部 医药管理国际研究中心, 北京 100191
    3. 中国生物技术发展中心, 北京 100036
  • 收稿日期:2012-11-15 修回日期:2013-03-22 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 史录文*

Economic evaluation of soft silicon foam dressings versus sterile gauze for the treatment of pressure ulcers in China

Sheng Han, Kuan Wang, Run Pu, Luwen Shi*   

  1. 1. Public Health College, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
    2. International Research Center of Medicinal Administration, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
    3. China National Center for Biotechnology Development, Beijing 100036, China
  • Received:2012-11-15 Revised:2013-03-22 Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-09-15
  • Contact: Luwen Shi*

摘要:

为了综合评价软聚硅酮泡沫吸收敷料(美皮康)在圧疮治疗中的有效性与经济性, 经文献研究规范化系统评价, 结合临床治疗数据, 应用决策树模型进行成本效果分析。研究结果表明: 美皮康在产品疗效、综合成本方面与传统的无菌纱布相比均存在明显优势。

关键词: 美皮康, 经济性, 压疮, 系统评价

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of soft silicone foam dressings (SSFD, Mepilex) on the treatment of pressure ulcers. We searched electronic databases and retrieved articles to make a systematic evaluation, and then make a cost-effectiveness analysis by decision tree model combined with data from clinical treatments. The result shows that compared with the common sterile gauze, SSFD possesses an apparent advantage. The effective ratio is 96.3% versus 77.3%, although the cost of SSFD is much higher than that of sterile gauze, Mepilex appears to be more cost-effectiveness for preventive use.

Key words: ft silicon foam dressings, Cost-effectiveness, Pressure ulcers, Systematic evaluation

中图分类号: 

Supporting:

*Corresponding author. Tel.: 10-86-82805019