http://jcps.bjmu.edu.cn

Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 744-753.DOI: 10.5246/jcps.2015.11.095

• Original articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of cilnidipine and L-type calcium channel blockers on renal functions in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials

Xiaochun Ye1, Zhi Dong2*, Chunjing Zhao3, Di Li3, Yan Qian3   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, the Thirteenth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400053, China
    2. Chongqing Key Laboratory for Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Chongqing 400016, China
    3. Department of Pharmacy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2015-05-17 Revised:2015-07-17 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-07-29
  • Contact: Tel.: 86-23-63631918, E-mail: zhidong073@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Chongqing Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant No. 2015ZBXM005).

Abstract:

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of cilnidipine and L-type calcium channel blockers (L-type CCBs) on renal function in hypertensive patients. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cilnidipine and L-type CCBs on hypertension treatment were selected from Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar, CNKI, Science Direct, Ebsco, Springer, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Medline, VIP and Wanfang databases (from the date of databases’ establishment to September 2014). Data were independently evaluated following the Jadad standard. The percentage changes of serum creatinine (SCr) value, urinary protein excretion (UPE), urinary protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) pre- and post-treatment were extracted for the subsequent meta-analysis. The mean difference (MD) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were determined using RevMan 5.3 software.A total of 10 RCTs of high quality were included and analyzed by fixed- or random-effect models. The results indicated that UPE (MD = –36.59, 95% CI: –70.85, –2.33) or UPCR (MD = –46.56, 95% CI: –88.50, –4.62) was significantly reduced by cilnidipine compared with L-type CCBs. However, such significant difference was not detected in reduction of SCr (MD = 0.01, 95% CI: –2.97, 2.98) or eGFR (MD = 1.56, 95% CI: –0.19, 3.31). Compared with L-type CCBs, cilnidipine was more effective in reducing proteinuria or preventing the proteinuria progression. In addition, we did not find significant differences in SCr and eGFR between the two groups.

Key words: Cilnidipine, L-type CCBs, Renal function, Meta-analysis, Randomized controlled trial

CLC Number: 

Supporting: