http://jcps.bjmu.edu.cn

Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 370-384.DOI: 10.5246/jcps.2025.04.028

• Original articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Cost-effectiveness of sustained-release isosorbide mononitrate capsules for coronary heart disease: A network meta-analysis

Hui Zhang1,2, Danxia Luo1,2, Xuelan Zhou1,2, Xiaofang Zeng1,2, Ran Xiong1,2, Yeyou Xu1,2,*()   

  1. 1 School of Medical Business, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
    2 Guangdong Health Economics and Health Promotion Research Center, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2024-11-08 Revised:2025-02-27 Accepted:2025-03-06 Online:2025-05-02 Published:2025-05-02
  • Contact: Yeyou Xu
  • Supported by:
    The 2022 Ministry of Education General Project for Humanities and Social Sciences Research (Grant No. 22YJAZH147); the General Subject of Guangzhou Philosophy and Social Science Development "14th Five-Year Plan" in 2023 (Grant No. 2023GZYB68); China University Industry-Academia-Research Innovation Fund-Huatong Guokang Medical Research Special Project (Grant No. 2023HT017); 2024 Guangdong Province General Project for the Planning of Philosophy and Social Sciences (Grant No. GD24CGL29); the Innovation Team Project of Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2022WCXTD011).

Abstract:

Different dosage forms can significantly impact pharmacokinetics in vivo, leading to varied effects and potential adverse reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release capsules (IMSRC) combined with conventional treatments, compared to isosorbide mononitrate tablets (IMT) combined with conventional treatments, for managing angina pectoris in patients with coronary heart diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of IMSRC and IMT. Relevant literature was sourced from databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, covering publications up to July 2023. The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed from the perspective of China’s healthcare system, utilizing inputs derived from the NMA. The analysis included 15 studies. The NMA results revealed no significant difference in efficacy and safety between IMSRC plus conventional treatments and IMT plus conventional treatments. However, both combinations were more effective than conventional treatments without isosorbide mononitrate. No differences in safety were observed among the three groups. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) of the NMA indicated that IMT had a slight edge over IMSRC in the total effective rate of angina pectoris, whereas IMSRC showed higher probabilities for markedly effective rate and ECG effective rate compared to IMT. The incidence of adverse events was ranked as IMT > conventional preparation > IMSRC. The CEA results highlighted that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the markedly effective and total effective rates of angina pectoris were –133.41 and –260.20, respectively. The ICERs for ECG effective rates were –83.34 and –234.24, respectively. In conclusion, while IMSRC combined with conventional treatments and IMT combined with conventional treatments were similar in efficacy and safety, IMSRC proved to be more economical.

Key words: Isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release capsules, Network meta-analysis, Cost-effectiveness, Coronary heart disease

Supporting: /attached/file/20250504/20250504143422_81.pdf